RubyX

RubyX is about native code generation in and of ruby. In other words, compiling ruby to binary, in ruby.

X can be read as X times faster, or a decade away, depending on mindset.

The last rewrite clarified the roles of the different layers of the system, see below. The overhaul is done and rubyx produces working binaries.

Processing goes through layers: Ruby --> Vool --> Mom --> Risc --> Arm --> binary .

Currently most functional constructs work to some (usable) degree, ie if, while, assignment, ivars, calling and dynamic dispatch all work. Work continues on blocks currently, see below.

Layers

Ruby

Ruby is input layer, we use whitequarks parser to parse ruby. The untyped ast is then transformed into a typed version. The classes and fields follow the ast output pretty much one to one. The we transform to Vool, removing much of ruby's "fluff".

Vool

Vool is a Virtual Object Oriented Language. Virtual in that is has no own syntax. But it has semantics, and those are substantially simpler than ruby.

Vool is Ruby without the fluff. No unless, no reverse if/while, no splats. Just simple oo. (Without this level the step down to the next layer was just too big)

Mom

The Minimal Object Machine layer is the first machine layer. This means it has instructions rather than statements. Instructions (in all machine layers) are a linked list.

Mom has no concept of memory yet, only objects. Data is transferred directly from object to object with one of Mom's main instructions, the SlotLoad.

Mainly Mom is an easy to understand step on the way down. A mix of oo and machine. In practise it means that the amount of instructions that need to be generated in vool is much smaller (easier to understand) and the mapping down to risc is quite straightforward.

Risc

The risc cpu architecture approach was a simplification of the cpu instruction set to a minimum. Arm, our main target, is a risc architecture, and much like Vool uncrinkles Ruby, the Risc layer simplifies ARM.

The Risc layer here abstracts the Arm in a minimal and independent way. It does not model any real RISC cpu instruction set, but rather implements what is needed for rubyx.

Instructions are derived from a base class, so the instruction set is extensible. This way additional functionality may be added by external code.

Risc knows memory and has a small set of registers. It allows memory to register transfer and back, and inter register transfer. But has no memory to memory transfer like Mom.

Arm

There is a minimal Arm assembler that transforms Risc instructions to Arm instructions. This is mostly a one to one mapping, though it does introduce the quirks that ARM has and that were left out of the Risc layer.

Elf

Arm instructions assemble themselves into binary code. A minimal Elf implementation is able to create executable binaries from the assembled code and Parfait objects.

Parfait

Generating code (by descending above layers) is only half the story in an oo system. The other half is classes, types, constant objects and a minimal run-time. This is what is Parfait is.

Parfait has basic clases like string/array/hash, and also anything that is really needed to express code, ie Class/Type/Method/Block.

Parfait is used at compile time, and the objects get serialised into the executable to make up, or make up the executable, and are thus available at run time. Currently the methods are not parsed yet, so do not exist at runtime yet.

Builtin

There are a small number of methods that can not be coded in ruby. For example an integer addition, or a instance variable access. These methods exists in any compiler, and are called builtin here.

Builtin methods are coded at the risc level with a dsl. Even though basically assembler, they are (quite readable) through the ruby magic.

Types and classes, static vs dynamic

Classes in dynamic languages are open. They can change at any time, meaning you can add/remove methods and use any instance variable. This is the reason dynamic languages are interpreted.

For Types to make any sense, they have to be static, immutable.

Some people have equated Classes with Types, this is a basic mistake in dynamic languages.

In rubyx a Type implements a Class (at a certain time of that classes lifetime). It defines the methods and instance variables available. This is key to generating efficient code that uses type information to access instance variables.

When a class changes, say a new method is added that uses a new instance variable, a new Type is generated to describe the class at that point. New code is generated for this new Type.

In essence the Class always has a current Type and many Types implement (different versions of) a Class.

All Objects have a Type, as their first member (also integers!). The Type points to the Class that the object has in oo terms.

Classes are defined by ruby code, but the methods of a Type (that are executed) are defined by Mom and Risc only.

Other

Interpreter

After doing some debugging on the generated binaries i opted to write an interpreter for the risc layer. That way tests run on the interpreter reveal most issues.

Debugger

And after the interpreter was done, i wrote a visual debugger. It is a simple opal application that nevertheless has proven a great help, both in figuring out what is going on, and in finding bugs.

Status

The above architecture is implemented. At the top level the RubyXCompiler works pretty much as you'd expect, by falling down the layers. And when it get's to the Risc layer it slots the builtin in there as if is were just normal code.

Specifically here is a list of what works:

• if (with or without else)
• while
• return
• assignment (local/args/ivar)
• static calling (where method is determined at compile time)
• dynamic dispatch with caching

Current work is on implicit blocks, which are surprisingly like static method calls and lambdas like dynamic dispatch.

Contributing to rubyx

Probably best to talk to me, if it's not a typo or so.

There is a todo, for inspiration, though actual tasks that result in pulls, should start their live as a github issue. There we can discuss details so that no work is done in vain. There are some small issues there already, just comment if you're interested.

Fork and create a branch before sending pulls.

Stary sky

Iterate:

1. more cpus (ie intel)
2. more systems (ie mac)
3. more syscalls, there are after all some hundreds
4. A lot of modern cpu's functionality has to be mapped to ruby and implemented in assembler to be useful
5. Different sized machines, with different register types ?
6. on 64bit, there would be 8 bits for types and thus allow for rational, complex, and whatnot
7. Housekeeping (the superset of gc) is abundant
8. Any amount of time could be spent on a decent digital tree (see judy). Or possibly Dr.Cliffs hash.
9. Also better string/arrays would be good.
10. The minor point of threads and hopefully lock free primitives to deal with that.
11. Other languages, python at least, maybe others

And generally optimise and work towards that perfect world (we never seem to be able to attain).

Copyright

Copyright (c) 2014-8 Torsten Ruger.

See LICENSE.txt for further details.