239 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
239 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# Beginners Guide
|
|
|
|
We are coming up to RailsGirlsSummerOfCode, so i wrote this document for people with
|
|
very little coding or ruby experience. It can be used by other people as a check-list,
|
|
because basically anything in here is assumed when working on RubyX.
|
|
|
|
# Tools of the trade
|
|
|
|
I just want to introduce the main characters, what you need, maybe some extra.
|
|
Details for installing or using software are abound on the net, so i am not getting
|
|
into specifics, platform issues or the like. Just an overview that you may not find
|
|
on the net.
|
|
|
|
## Terminal
|
|
|
|
The terminal and editor are still the two main tools you need. A terminal is a program
|
|
that interprets typed input and starts other programs. The interpreters are called
|
|
shells, bash (Bourne Again SHell) is popular, but anything you have is fine.
|
|
|
|
The shell starts when you start a terminal (window or tab) and usually reads somehting
|
|
like .profile, or .bash_profile , where environment variables may be set. These
|
|
variables, usually with capital names, influence the behaviour of programs. The most
|
|
import one is probably the PATH variable, that determines where program executables
|
|
are searched.
|
|
|
|
Don't fuss in the beginning which terminal you use, anything is fine for starters.
|
|
|
|
When i talk about commands, i mean typing those commands in the terminal.
|
|
|
|
## Editor
|
|
|
|
Off course you need an editor to edit program files. The most important thing here is
|
|
that it supports colour highlighting for ruby. It may be an IDE like RubyMine, vim, or
|
|
i use atom. It does not really matter, as long as you know how to use it.
|
|
|
|
## Ruby, maybe with versions
|
|
|
|
There are two main ruby implementations, called MRI (Matz Ruby implementations) and
|
|
JRuby (Java Ruby), we will use MRI.
|
|
|
|
There are several versions of MRI, though that used to matter more than it does now.
|
|
Anything over 2.4 is fine for RubyX.
|
|
|
|
Because version differences were bigger, and in a professional environment it is
|
|
essential to know the exact version on is using (in development and production)
|
|
ruby version managers have been developed. There are rbenv and rvm , but since
|
|
you don't really need them i will leave it at that.
|
|
|
|
## Gems
|
|
|
|
Gems are packages of ruby code. After all, any meaningful software will rely on other
|
|
software, and so gems have been with ruby from the start as a way of packaging code.
|
|
|
|
Eg rubyx is a gem, and you can see the package definition in rubyx.gemspec in the root
|
|
folder.
|
|
|
|
gem is also a command to manage gems. A version of gem (the command) will come with
|
|
any ruby installation. gem is used to manage single packages, but for a project
|
|
we usually need many gems, and this is where bundler comes in.
|
|
|
|
## Bundler
|
|
|
|
Bundler is a program (a gem actually) to manage all the gems a project needs. The
|
|
problem it was made to solve is this: Say you need 10 gems for a project. Those 10
|
|
gems all have dependencies of their own, so really you may need 20-40 gems.
|
|
If not managed, different developers and production systems will have slightly
|
|
different versions of gems. This leads to very hard to track errors, a nightmare
|
|
basically.
|
|
|
|
A Gemfile is the bundlers way of specifying a projects dependencies. Bundler
|
|
(using the command bundle install) then resolves all dependencies and their
|
|
dependencies and installs all the needed gems.
|
|
|
|
Bundler also creates a Gemfile.lock to record all the gems that are needed. This file
|
|
is usually checked in and will ensure that every developer has the same gems.
|
|
|
|
Only when the Gemfile is changed, or one wants to update gems by hand, does bundle
|
|
install need to be run again.
|
|
|
|
## Git
|
|
|
|
Version control has always been essential to coordinate the work of many people,
|
|
and git is arguably the best tool for the job. So you need to install it and get
|
|
to know the basics, at least clone, commit, push, and basic branches.
|
|
|
|
After installing MRI and bundler you need to clone the rubyx repository.
|
|
Go to the directory and bundle (or bundle install, sama sama)
|
|
|
|
Then you can run "ruby test/test_all.rb" to determine that everything is working as it
|
|
should. If it does, you are ready to start development.
|
|
|
|
# Development process
|
|
|
|
Once you have a working environment, you'll be wanting to code. So this section is
|
|
about the basic loops we go through as developers, the recurring tasks that make
|
|
up a programmers life. I'll try to avoid jargon and rather explain why we do what we do.
|
|
|
|
## Edit => Save
|
|
|
|
The most basic cycle is undoubtedly edit and save. You edit some part of the program
|
|
and save your work. There are some details to consider about the formatting and style,
|
|
in the [Code Style](CodeStyle.md).
|
|
|
|
There are two basic needs to do this basic coding:
|
|
- you need to know what to edit, what it is you want to achieve and how to achieve it
|
|
- having finished (saved) you need a way to know if you have achieved what you set out to do
|
|
|
|
The "how to achieve it" part is the skill of programming. Like all skills, developing
|
|
this skill is a process and takes years, so i'll leave it at that.
|
|
|
|
What you want to achieve is up to you. Your imagination for the new. Your ability to
|
|
find bugs. Or your willingness to do what others have found worthy of doing (issues).
|
|
This is explained more in the next section.
|
|
|
|
So then we come to that crucial part of knowing when you achieved your goal. This has
|
|
been at the crux of programming since the dawn, and the most widely agreed upon way is
|
|
off course testing. Everybody agrees testing is the way, just how much is in dispute.
|
|
It's like being healthy: everybody agrees in principle, but many still smoke, or
|
|
eat meat or milk products (clearly shown to be unhealthy)
|
|
|
|
## Testing (or edit => save => test)
|
|
|
|
RubyX is very clear on the topic: all code needs tests. All new code needs new test.
|
|
Every bug-fix needs more tests. Tests are the only way we know things work, and
|
|
since RubyX produces programs as it's output (which should run correctly), we need
|
|
to know doubly well that everything works. Both the RubyX code, and the generated code,
|
|
must work, ie be tested. Some may call this TDD extreme, i call it common sense, and
|
|
find it is the best way to work.
|
|
|
|
Specifically RubyX uses minitest, and has several layers of tests under the test
|
|
directory. Generally speaking, test files contain ruby code called tests.
|
|
This code exercises the source code and asserts (tests)
|
|
assumptions to be correct. Minitest provides a base Test class to derive from and
|
|
about ten different assert methods to assert assumptions. Methods of the class must
|
|
start with test_ and each such method is called a test.
|
|
|
|
RubyX currently has over 1700 tests with almost 15000 assertions.
|
|
At about 7k lines of code, that is roughly 2 assertion for each line of code. this
|
|
should give you an idea how important testing is in RubyX.
|
|
|
|
## Automated testing (edit, save , autotest) or guard
|
|
|
|
Guard is a tool to run tests automatically. Similarly to bundler, Guard defines
|
|
a Guardfile to define which tests should be run, and a command-line tool (guard)
|
|
to run them automatically.
|
|
|
|
Basic tests mirror the same directory structure as the code in the test
|
|
directory. Basic (or unit) tests live in files with the same name as the source
|
|
code file name, with a "test_" prefix, in a shadowed directory. Eg for a file
|
|
/lib/parfait/word.rb , there will be a file in /test/parfait/test_word.rb .
|
|
|
|
The Guardfile defines conventions like this, in code. So there
|
|
is a basic rule in the Guardfile stating that when a source file changes
|
|
the equivalent test file should be run. Other rules may be added easily,
|
|
as a Guardfile is really just ruby code, working against the guard api.
|
|
|
|
The way to use guard is to have a terminal open and start the guard command.
|
|
Guard will listen for changes, and once a file is saved *automatically* run
|
|
affected test files.
|
|
|
|
This way we're back to edit, save, the shortest possible loop. Only when all tests
|
|
are green, and there are enough (new) tests to cover the code, can you move on to the
|
|
next phase, sharing your code.
|
|
|
|
# Contribution process
|
|
|
|
Open source is all about sharing code. It maybe for the greater good, or just fun,
|
|
but it is working together in a coordinated fashion. Git (with commit rights) is
|
|
what makes the coordination easy, some might say possible.
|
|
|
|
You start with a clean environment, either you just cloned, or pulled from github.
|
|
|
|
There are several ways to find what you want to work on, but all roads lead to
|
|
github issue. You either find an existing one, or create one. Don't start
|
|
work on something that has no issue, and the best way is to make your intention
|
|
clear, by commenting on the issue.
|
|
|
|
## Topic branches and issues
|
|
|
|
Once you have a topic (and a github issue to go with it) you want to start coding.
|
|
But don' just yet. To manage you changes with others, it is best to create what is called a topic branch. Branches are very cheap in git (very little resources required),
|
|
and make it so much easier to manage the code. It is really not advisable to
|
|
skip this step (read: your contribution may not be accepted, which really is in
|
|
no-ones interest, least your own) unless it is a tiny, non-controversial change
|
|
like a typo.
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b 65_my_bugfix
|
|
|
|
This is the command to start a new (topic) branch. You'll want to start with the
|
|
github issue number and add a short description for the task.
|
|
|
|
## work on the issue / branch
|
|
|
|
As described above, you can now edit the code and tests to work on the issue.
|
|
You may use the github issue for discussion or help. You can also push the branch
|
|
to github and collaborate on the code. Or have someone review it.
|
|
|
|
Use guard, write minitests, edit (according to code guidelines) until happy.
|
|
Commit, push and create a pull request.
|
|
|
|
## about committing
|
|
|
|
Regular small commits make for the best workflow. Where the line goes is a little
|
|
bit experience, but often it is no more than 5 affected files, no more than 50-60
|
|
lines affected. For a professional, 1-4 hours, for a beginner more.
|
|
|
|
Commits should be grouped around topics. Ideally (but not always) a commit takes the
|
|
whole project back to green (all tests working). But this is not always possible
|
|
and should not keep you from making commits. Commit when you have made some kind
|
|
of milestone, some small but cohesive change.
|
|
|
|
Usually beginners tend to make to large commits, but just to mention that there is also
|
|
a lower limit. Technical a single line may be a commit, but it would have to be a very,
|
|
possibly very very important line. Ie a critical fix, a version update know to break
|
|
things.
|
|
|
|
Usually i don't commit changes under 10 lines. If they happen, i band them together
|
|
with the next commit, possibly mention them in the (then multi-line) commit message.
|
|
|
|
About commit messages, they should describe the change in passive mode, as if the
|
|
commit made the changes. Ie "Fixes bug 36" , or "Adds method XXX to YY"
|
|
|
|
## pull request
|
|
|
|
A pull request is you asking the project owner (or anyone with commit rights) to
|
|
accept your work and merge it into the main (master) branch.
|
|
|
|
For small issues and especially when it has been discussed, this is a press of a button
|
|
for the project owner. But for larger changes, he/she may want to pull the
|
|
branch to their machine, look at it and consider.
|
|
|
|
If there are changes to be made, more discussion may follow. This may result in
|
|
you having to make more changes and so the process continues. This is why topic
|
|
branches are so important, to keep this kind of back and forth out of the main
|
|
branch and maintain a working / clean master branch.
|
|
|
|
After a pull request has been accepted, you go back to the master branch, pull
|
|
changes, and start again with a new topic. And so life for the developer continues :-)
|