ruby-x/ruby-x.github.io
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add benchmark graph

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Torsten Ruger 2015-11-27 22:20:21 +02:00
parent d6d35048e8
commit c06849c5d6
3 changed files with 3 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

BIN
soml/bench.numbers Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.

BIN
soml/bench.png Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 79 KiB

10
soml/benchmarks.md
View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ performance is not outstanding, but still there were some surprises.
- add - run integer adds by linear fibonacci of 40
- call - exercise calling by recursive fibonacci of 20
Hello and puti and add run 100_000 iterations per program invocation to remove startup overhead.
Hello and itos and add run 100_000 iterations per program invocation to remove startup overhead.
Call only has 10000 iterations, as it is much slower, executing about 10000 calls per invocation
Gcc used to compile c on the machine. soml executables produced by ruby (on another machine)
@ -24,13 +24,9 @@ Results were measured by a ruby script. Mean and variance was measured until var
always under one percent.
The machine was a virtual arm run on a powerbook, performance roughly equivalent to a raspberry pi.
But results should be seen as relative, not absolute.
But results should be seen as relative, not absolute (some were scaled)
|language | loop | hello | itos | add | call | | loop | hello | itos | add | call |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|c | 0,0500 | 2,1365 | 0,2902 | 0,1245 | 0,8535 | | + 33 % | + 79 % | | | |
|soml | 0,0374 | 1,2071 | 0,7263 | 0,2247 | 1,3625 | | | | + 150% | + 80 % | + 60 % |
![Graph](bench.png)
### Discussion