- Adds tests for the remaining methods in the `InsuranceController`.
- Adds a `countAllInsuranceItems()` method to the `InsuranceController`.
- Adds the Vitest UI and coverage packages.
- Updates the `profileInsuranceFactory` to use second-epoch dates instead of millisecond-epoch dates.
- Updates the `InsuranceController.fetchHideoutItemParent()` method to log a warning when an item with a slotId of 'hideout' cannot be found.
TODO:
- The Vitest coverage options are not working.
Event bots are generated from their base type, then their role is updated before being sent to the client e.g. peacefullZryachiyEvent becomes bossZryachiy for generation, then back to peacefullZryachiyEvent
- Implement formula based on 30 weapon repairs done on live
- Return the repair amount as `repairAmount` from `repairItemByKit`
- Add an additional `repairPoints` to `RepairDetails` to return the repair points used
- Update `repairAmount` references to `repairPoints` to keep old behavior
- Add new parameter to rewardSkillPoints that applies live-like level scaling
- Only give weapon maintenance XP when using a repair kit
This implementation comes with a "Crit Fail" and "Crit Success" mechanic to account for live sometimes randomly being -4 or +4 off from my estimated values. By default the chance of each is 10%, and they can overlap and cancel each other out
Spreadsheet of live repair data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-tR4WYelhZfKZ3ZDbxr3nd73Y60E1wQRjDWONpMVSew/edit?usp=sharing
Useful columns:
C: The amount of dura attempted to be repaired, this is used in the estimated skill calculated
G: Hand entered value of how much skill gain I actually saw on live (Multiplied by 10 for readability. So "3.2" would be "32")
J: The estimated skill gain, based on the calculation included in this merge request
K: How far off the estimated skill gain was (Negative implies we guessed high and the actual result was lower)
One thing of note:
I've modified all the existing references to `repairAmount` to be the new `repairPoints` when a repair kit is used. This is to keep the existing behaviour outside of my direct changes as much as possible.
However, this seems to be incorrect in some cases (For example, buff chance is repairPoints/maxDura, but repairPoints will go down the higher your int. I'm assuming this is meant to be repairedDura/maxDura). May want to update these references to use `repairAmount` once they've been confirmed to expect the repair amount instead of repair points used.
Co-authored-by: DrakiaXYZ <565558+TheDgtl@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-on: https://dev.sp-tarkov.com/SPT-AKI/Server/pulls/164
Co-authored-by: DrakiaXYZ <drakiaxyz@noreply.dev.sp-tarkov.com>
Co-committed-by: DrakiaXYZ <drakiaxyz@noreply.dev.sp-tarkov.com>
- Created profileInsurance test fixture.
- Created ProfileInsurance test factory class.
- Improved many of the InsuranceController method tests by utilizing the factory and fixture. Still some left to do here.
- Adds the `date-fns` package as a development dependancy for easy date manipulation.
- Cleaned up some comments.
Bug Fixes 🐞
- Resolved an issue where `ItemHelper.getAttachmentMainParent()` was not returning null when it should have.
- Resolved an issue where `InsuranceController.populateParentAttachmentsMap()` would continue to process when the parent could not be found.
