- Remaining Developer Guides and Upgrading
- SilverStripe in a namespace or api has not been change
- To keep PRs easier no formatting was changed
Update merge conflics with two files
Update Silverstripe Ltd, Silverstripe Cloud and Silverstripe CMS
Silverstripe CMS Ltd > Silverstripe Ltd
Silverstripe CMS Platform > Silverstripe Cloud
Silverstripe CMS Framework > Silverstripe CMS
Resolve merge conflict
Remove Framework from Silverstripe CMS Framework
- 3 files
Change SilverStripe CMS to Silverstripe CMS
See https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework/issues/9232.
Also simplifies composer instructions a bit:
- Removes composer update --no-dev references, that's a bit of an edge case that people can just discover on getcomposer.org if they need it
- Changed example from the unused and oudated silverstripe/forum to silverstripe/blog
- Updated example versions to 4.x
- Remove "updating composer" section, it now tells you if its out of date
- Remove ss-auto-git-ignore module reference. The module hasn't been updated in ages, and it's much less necessary now that all relevant modules are on composer
- Add .env example config to getting started docs, I didn't realise it was stripped from the default --prefer-dist composer install
- Stronger wording around "use composer"
- Consistent domain and email address naming
- Removed example for publishing non-composer modules (those shouldn't be encouraged)
- Removed instructions for installing modules from archives
[ci skip]
It's more standard to have this file in the webroot.
It's technically markdown compatible text (e.g. asterisk bullet points),
but there's not much point in rendering it via markdown.
If you use the Github "new repo" dialog, it'll create the file without
an extension, so that's pretty much considered the standard.
