This pattern improves over the current usage of singleton by allowing type inference.
This also better supports refactor, code usage detection, and auto-completion of classes.
API Mailer bounce email can now be configured
API Mailer no longer calls Convert::xml2raw on all email subjects
API Deprecate dead Mailer code and refactored duplicate or mis-documented code.
There's no way to make things like [api:DataObject->beforeUpdateCMSFields()] work, is there?
I removed those kind of api tags (the links yielded a 404 page), and corrected a few other link-rendering issues.
BUG Fix incompatibility in Member_GroupList
Fix regressions in merges from 3.1
BUG Fix Security failing on test classes
BUG Fix postgresql compatibility
Clarify sql encoding of table names
Database abstraction broken up into controller, connector, query builder, and schema manager, each independently configurable via YAML / Injector
Creation of new DBQueryGenerator for database specific generation of SQL
Support for parameterised queries, move of code base to use these over escaped conditions
Refactor of SQLQuery into separate query classes for each of INSERT UPDATE DELETE and SELECT
Support for PDO
Installation process upgraded to use new ORM
SS_DatabaseException created to handle database errors, maintaining details of raw sql and parameter details for user code designed interested in that data.
Renamed DB static methods to conform correctly to naming conventions (e.g. DB::getConn -> DB::get_conn)
3.2 upgrade docs
Performance Optimisation and simplification of code to use more concise API
API Ability for database adapters to register extensions to ConfigureFromEnv.php
Changed Fragment links to Anchor links, however it's is slighty confusing what the right name for the thing is.
According to w3.org: "Some URIs refer to a location within a resource. This kind of URI ends with "#" followed by an anchor identifier (called the fragment identifier)." - http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/intro/intro.html#fragment-uri
After doing some research in the most common used name for the #some-link identifier I came to the conclusion that most of the time (about 70% on StackOverflow/BlogArticles/Interwebz) Anchor-link was the term used to describe the identifier. Imho, Anchor is the prefered term for the identifier.
Is it acceptable to change fragment to anchor, since it seems more used?
