Caused by SS loading a URL with html entities (&)
through the Requirements API, which only works when directly
inserted into the HTML template (standard behaviour),
but garbles the URL GET parameters when loaded via the jQuery.ondemand
JavaScript/XHR logic.
It didn't fail the request, just meant that tiny_mce_gzip.php wasn't
getting all the required options from the GET parameters.
And since this newly loaded file contains the same JS globals,
it would override previously loaded (correct) state.
The deprecations are supposed to denote the release where
the functionality will be removed, as opposed to the one where
its deprecated. Having 3.1 as a target for recent changes
in popular methods like Object::add_extension() causes
too many short-term hassles, there's no "grace period".
Extracted common code out to SS_HTMLValue and made abstract, then
put HTML 4 specific code in SS_HTML4Value. Its now possible to
replace HTMLValue with one designed for HTML 5 or XHTML
Requires a code change from new SS_HTMLValue to
Injector::inst()->create(HTMLValue)
When saveInto is called on ListboxField and CheckboxsetField,
UnsavedRelationList should be an acceptable relationship type. This is
leading to relations not being saved on initial creation of Member
objects
This bug was introduced with the new nested CMS actions
around December 2012, but wasn't noticed until now
because checkAccessAction() would wrongly return TRUE
before the dataFieldByName() check was reached.
At the moment form actions (buttons) have the classes 'action action' as default. This is because the extraClass function adds 'action' and then calls the parent method. The parent then includes the $this->Type() ('action') again.
So I've remove this overloading of extraClass
This bug was introduced with the new nested CMS actions
around December 2012, but wasn't noticed until now
because checkAccessAction() would wrongly return TRUE
before the dataFieldByName() check was reached.
RequestHandler#handleAction now exists. It takes the request, and
the action to call on itself. All calls from handleRequest to call an action
will go through this method
Controller#handleAction has had it's signature changed to
match new RequestHandler#handleAction
RequestHandler#findAction has been added, which extracts the
"match URL to rules to find action" portion of RequestHandler#handleRequest
into a separate, overrideable function
GridField#handleAction has beeen renamed to handleAlterAction and
CMSBatchActionHandler#handleAction has been renamed to handleBatchAction to
avoid name clash with new RequestHandler#handleAction
Reason for change: The exact behaviour of request handling depended heavily
on whether you inherited from RequestHandler or Controller, and whether the
rule extracted it's action directly (like "foo/$ID" => 'foo') or dynamically
(like "$Action/$ID" => "handleAction"). This cleans up behaviour so
all calls follow the same path through handleRequest and handleAction, and
the additional behaviour that Controller adds is clear.
We shouldn't pass it to the child fields since it ends
up showing the description three times in the default
"inline" mode. If the description is required as a hover/focus effect,
it can be set individually on the fields.
Sometimes has-one UploadFields can get confused about whether or not there is an existing file that needs deleting. This setting lets you make a more robust has-one UploadField, where any existing file will be replaced. It more closely mimics simple single-file upload fields.
This is the companion setting to canUpload, letting you control whether existing files from the asset store can be referenced. It's particularly useful when using UploadField on the front-end.
Although editing meta-data or deleting permanently would require File editing/deleting permissions, merely linking to a record does not. This change is important for allowing front-end use of UploadField; or, more importantly, use of UploadFile by people without CMS rights.
The new config setter restores the 2.4 behaviour of including <input type="hidden"> with a field. Although as a default, this option has security flaws; it is useful in a few circumstances and, if nothing else, is handy to make upgrading sites easier.
This hook is useful so that you can add additional fields / actions in a gridfield form that are not available in other settings (e.g. additional actions: previous / next / save and publish / unpublish / etc
Function unset() preserves numeric keys and method removeRequiredField() will give a PHP notice about nonexistent array key and loop won't iterate throughout all elements in array on second method call (and all subsequent).
So it's better to use foreach loop and array_splice() function (it doesn't preserve numeric keys).
