silverstripe-framework/docs/en/02_Developer_Guides/00_Model/02_Relations.md

479 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
title: Relations between Records
2014-10-28 04:45:46 +01:00
summary: Relate models together using the ORM using has_one, has_many, and many_many.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
# Relations between Records
In most situations you will likely see more than one [DataObject](api:SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject) and several classes in your data model may relate
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
to one another. An example of this is a `Player` object may have a relationship to one or more `Team` or `Coach` classes
and could take part in many `Games`. Relations are a key part of designing and building a good data model.
Relations are built through static array definitions on a class, in the format `<relationship-name> => <classname>`.
SilverStripe supports a number of relationship types and each relationship type can have any number of relations.
## has_one
A 1-to-1 relation creates a database-column called "`<relationship-name>`ID", in the example below this would be
"TeamID" on the "Player"-table.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
2017-08-05 00:45:24 +02:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
class Team extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $db = [
'Title' => 'Varchar'
];
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_many = [
'Players' => 'Player'
];
}
class Player extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_one = [
"Team" => "Team",
];
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
This defines a relationship called `Team` which links to a `Team` class. The `ORM` handles navigating the relationship
and provides a short syntax for accessing the related object.
2014-10-28 04:45:46 +01:00
At the database level, the `has_one` creates a `TeamID` field on `Player`. A `has_many` field does not impose any database changes. It merely injects a new method into the class to access the related records (in this case, `Players()`)
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$player = Player::get()->byId(1);
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$team = $player->Team();
// returns a 'Team' instance.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
echo $player->Team()->Title;
// returns the 'Title' column on the 'Team' or `getTitle` if it exists.
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
The relationship can also be navigated in [templates](../templates).
```ss
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
<% with $Player %>
<% if $Team %>
Plays for $Team.Title
<% end_if %>
<% end_with %>
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
## Polymorphic has_one
A has_one can also be polymorphic, which allows any type of object to be associated.
This is useful where there could be many use cases for a particular data structure.
An additional column is created called "`<relationship-name>`Class", which along
with the ID column identifies the object.
To specify that a has_one relation is polymorphic set the type to 'DataObject'.
Ideally, the associated has_many (or belongs_to) should be specified with dot notation.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
class Player extends DataObject
{
private static $has_many = [
"Fans" => "Fan.FanOf"
];
}
class Team extends DataObject
{
private static $has_many = [
"Fans" => "Fan.FanOf"
];
}
// Type of object returned by $fan->FanOf() will vary
class Fan extends DataObject
{
// Generates columns FanOfID and FanOfClass
private static $has_one = [
"FanOf" => "DataObject"
];
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
<div class="warning" markdown='1'>
Note: The use of polymorphic relationships can affect query performance, especially
on joins, and also increases the complexity of the database and necessary user code.
They should be used sparingly, and only where additional complexity would otherwise
be necessary. E.g. Additional parent classes for each respective relationship, or
duplication of code.
</div>
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
## has_many
2014-10-28 04:45:46 +01:00
Defines 1-to-many joins. As you can see from the previous example, `$has_many` goes hand in hand with `$has_one`.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
<div class="alert" markdown='1'>
Please specify a $has_one-relationship on the related child-class as well, in order to have the necessary accessors
available on both ends.
</div>
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
2017-08-05 00:45:24 +02:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
class Team extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $db = [
'Title' => 'Varchar'
];
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_many = [
'Players' => 'Player'
];
}
class Player extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_one = [
"Team" => "Team",
];
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
Much like the `has_one` relationship, `has_many` can be navigated through the `ORM` as well. The only difference being
you will get an instance of [HasManyList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\HasManyList) rather than the object.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$team = Team::get()->first();
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
echo $team->Players();
// [HasManyList]
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
echo $team->Players()->Count();
// returns '14';
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
foreach($team->Players() as $player) {
echo $player->FirstName;
}
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
To specify multiple `$has_many` to the same object you can use dot notation to distinguish them like below:
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
2017-08-05 00:45:24 +02:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
class Person extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_many = [
"Managing" => "Company.Manager",
"Cleaning" => "Company.Cleaner",
];
}
class Company extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_one = [
"Manager" => "Person",
"Cleaner" => "Person"
];
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
Multiple `$has_one` relationships are okay if they aren't linking to the same object type. Otherwise, they have to be
named.
If you're using the default scaffolded form fields with multiple `has_one` relationships, you will end up with a CMS field for each relation. If you don't want these you can remove them by their IDs:
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
```php
public function getCMSFields()
{
$fields = parent::getCMSFields();
$fields->removeByName(array('ManagerID', 'CleanerID'));
return $fields;
}
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
## belongs_to
Defines a 1-to-1 relationship with another object, which declares the other end of the relationship with a
corresponding `$has_one`. A single database column named `<relationship-name>ID` will be created in the object with the
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
`$has_one`, but the $belongs_to by itself will not create a database field. This field will hold the ID of the object
declaring the `$belongs_to`.
Similarly with `$has_many`, dot notation can be used to explicitly specify the `$has_one` which refers to this relation.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
This is not mandatory unless the relationship would be otherwise ambiguous.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
class Team extends DataObject
{
private static $has_one = [
'Coach' => 'Coach'
];
}
class Coach extends DataObject
{
private static $belongs_to = [
'Team' => 'Team.Coach'
];
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
## many_many
Defines many-to-many joins, which uses a third table created between the two to join pairs.
There are two ways in which this can be declared, which are described below, depending on
how the developer wishes to manage this join table.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
<div class="warning" markdown='1'>
Please specify a $belongs_many_many-relationship on the related class as well, in order
to have the necessary accessors available on both ends.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
</div>
Much like the `has_one` relationship, `many_many` can be navigated through the `ORM` as well.
The only difference being you will get an instance of [ManyManyList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\ManyManyList) or
[ManyManyThroughList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\ManyManyThroughList) rather than the object.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$team = Team::get()->byId(1);
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$supporters = $team->Supporters();
// returns a 'ManyManyList' instance.
```
### Automatic many_many table
If you specify only a single class as the other side of the many-many relationship, then a
table will be automatically created between the two (this-class)_(relationship-name), will
be created with a pair of ID fields.
Extra fields on the mapping table can be created by declaring a `many_many_extraFields`
config to add extra columns.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
class Team extends DataObject
{
private static $many_many = [
"Supporters" => "Supporter",
];
private static $many_many_extraFields = [
'Supporters' => [
'Ranking' => 'Int'
]
];
}
class Supporter extends DataObject
{
private static $belongs_many_many = [
"Supports" => "Team",
];
}
```
### many_many through relationship joined on a separate DataObject
If necessary, a third DataObject class can instead be specified as the joining table,
rather than having the ORM generate an automatically scaffolded table. This has the following
advantages:
- Allows versioning of the mapping table, including support for the
[ownership api](/developer_guides/model/versioning).
- Allows support of other extensions on the mapping table (e.g. subsites).
- Extra fields can be managed separately to the joined dataobject, even via a separate
GridField or form.
This is declared via array syntax, with the following keys on the many_many:
- `through` Class name of the mapping table
- `from` Name of the has_one relationship pointing back at the object declaring many_many
- `to` Name of the has_one relationship pointing to the object declaring belongs_many_many.
Note: The `through` class must not also be the name of any field or relation on the parent
or child record.
The syntax for `belongs_many_many` is unchanged.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
class Team extends DataObject
{
private static $many_many = [
"Supporters" => [
'through' => 'TeamSupporter',
'from' => 'Team',
'to' => 'Supporter',
]
];
}
class Supporter extends DataObject
{
private static $belongs_many_many = [
"Supports" => "Team",
];
}
class TeamSupporter extends DataObject
{
private static $db = [
'Ranking' => 'Int',
];
private static $has_one = [
'Team' => 'Team',
'Supporter' => 'Supporter'
];
}
```
In order to filter on the join table during queries, you can use the class name of the joining table
for any sql conditions.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$team = Team::get()->byId(1);
$supporters = $team->Supporters()->where(['"TeamSupporter"."Ranking"' => 1]);
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
Note: ->filter() currently does not support joined fields natively due to the fact that the
query for the join table is isolated from the outer query controlled by DataList.
### Using many_many in templates
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
The relationship can also be navigated in [templates](../templates).
The joined record can be accessed via `Join` or `TeamSupporter` property (many_many through only)
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
```ss
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
<% with $Supporter %>
<% loop $Supports %>
Supports $Title <% if $TeamSupporter %>(rank $TeamSupporter.Ranking)<% end_if %>
<% end_if %>
<% end_with %>
```
You can also use `$Join` in place of the join class alias (`$TeamSupporter`), if your template
is class-agnostic and doesn't know the type of the join table.
## belongs_many_many
The belongs_many_many represents the other side of the relationship on the target data class.
When using either a basic many_many or a many_many through, the syntax for belongs_many_many is the same.
To specify multiple $many_manys between the same classes, specify use the dot notation to
distinguish them like below:
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
class Category extends DataObject
{
private static $many_many = [
'Products' => 'Product',
'FeaturedProducts' => 'Product'
];
}
class Product extends DataObject
{
private static $belongs_many_many = [
'Categories' => 'Category.Products',
'FeaturedInCategories' => 'Category.FeaturedProducts'
];
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
2014-10-28 04:45:46 +01:00
If you're unsure about whether an object should take on `many_many` or `belongs_many_many`,
the best way to think about it is that the object where the relationship will be edited
(i.e. via checkboxes) should contain the `many_many`. For instance, in a `many_many` of
Product => Categories, the `Product` should contain the `many_many`, because it is much
more likely that the user will select Categories for a Product than vice-versa.
2014-10-28 04:45:46 +01:00
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
## Adding relations
Adding new items to a relations works the same, regardless if you're editing a **has_many** or a **many_many**. They are
encapsulated by [HasManyList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\HasManyList) and [ManyManyList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\ManyManyList), both of which provide very similar APIs, e.g. an `add()`
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
and `remove()` method.
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
$team = Team::get()->byId(1);
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
// create a new supporter
$supporter = new Supporter();
$supporter->Name = "Foo";
$supporter->write();
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
// add the supporter.
$team->Supporters()->add($supporter);
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
## Custom Relations
You can use the ORM to get a filtered result list without writing any SQL. For example, this snippet gets you the
"Players"-relation on a team, but only containing active players.
See [DataObject::$has_many](api:SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject::$has_many) for more info on the described relations.
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
```php
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
2017-08-05 00:45:24 +02:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
class Team extends DataObject
{
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
2017-08-07 05:11:17 +02:00
private static $has_many = [
"Players" => "Player"
];
public function ActivePlayers()
{
return $this->Players()->filter('Status', 'Active');
}
}
2017-08-03 05:35:09 +02:00
```
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
<div class="notice" markdown="1">
Adding new records to a filtered `RelationList` like in the example above doesn't automatically set the filtered
criteria on the added record.
</div>
## Relations on Unsaved Objects
You can also set *has_many* and *many_many* relations before the `DataObject` is saved. This behavior uses the
[UnsavedRelationList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\UnsavedRelationList) and converts it into the correct `RelationList` when saving the `DataObject` for the first
2014-10-27 04:40:02 +01:00
time.
This unsaved lists will also recursively save any unsaved objects that they contain.
As these lists are not backed by the database, most of the filtering methods on `DataList` cannot be used on a list of
this type. As such, an `UnsavedRelationList` should only be used for setting a relation before saving an object, not
for displaying the objects contained in the relation.
## Related Documentation
* [Introduction to the Data Model and ORM](data_model_and_orm)
* [Lists](lists)
## API Documentation
* [HasManyList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\HasManyList)
* [ManyManyList](api:SilverStripe\ORM\ManyManyList)
* [DataObject](api:SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject)