rubyx/test
Torsten Ruger 5369dc3d52 rename get/set internal
to _word , because _byte versions are coming
2015-11-18 15:36:43 +02:00
..
bench arm program to generate optimal devision code for constants 2014-05-15 16:53:47 +03:00
elf fix the putstring sys call indexing 2015-11-15 22:03:06 +02:00
register rename get/set internal 2015-11-18 15:36:43 +02:00
soml fix the fix fix 2015-11-18 15:22:20 +02:00
helper.rb reinstate word creation and use for strings 2015-11-08 23:58:35 +02:00
README.md went over the various readmes 2015-10-07 11:32:48 +03:00
test_all.rb move parfait tests to some 2015-11-18 12:14:31 +02:00
test_runner.rb update the reader rewrite and reflect name changes 2015-10-09 17:51:14 +03:00

Testing

Testing is off course great, and well practised in the ruby community. Good tests exists in the parts where functionality is clear: Parsing and binary generation.

But it is difficult to write tests when you don't know what the functionality is. Also TDD does not really help as it assumes you know what you're doing.

I used minitest / test-unit as the framewok, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to salama, less work.

All

'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''

Parfait

Well, test Parfait. Not perfect, but growing as bugs appear. Basics are ok though.

Compiler

Different kinds of quite minimal tests that ensure we can go from parsed to code.

Fragments

Much more elaborate tests of the compling functionality. All code constructs and their output in terms of instructions are tested.

vm

Mostly tests about the Parfait compatibility layer and padding (for assmenbly). Slightly bad name ... wip