Torsten Rüger
d6c38d15ba
Before, when the type was determined, it was assumed that the method can be resolved. But off course tis is not true, as methods may be defined later in the file. Two solutions for that. One could (and should) define all methods and only then start to compile. Thus having the type safety. Or (as now) make a dynamic call and let it fail at runtime. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| arm | ||
| bench | ||
| elf | ||
| lib | ||
| mains | ||
| mom | ||
| parfait | ||
| risc | ||
| ruby | ||
| rubyx | ||
| support | ||
| util | ||
| vool | ||
| helper.rb | ||
| README.md | ||
| test_all.rb | ||
Testing
Tdd, Bdd , Xdd, whatever you call it, i have come to the point where it is a way not only to write software, but to think about software. Ie:
- if it's not tested, we don't know it works
- test first makes me think about the software from the outside. (good perspective)
I used minitest as the framework, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to rubyx, less work.
All
'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''
Parfait, Risc , Arm , Mom
Follow the directory structure of the source and may be called unit tests
Risc/Interpreter
Contains many system tests that rely on everything else working. Should be hoisted i guess.
Main
Much like the Interpreter test, but for Arm. This is where the currently few executables are generated and there is an automatic way of running them remotely.
The plan is to integrate this with the interpreter directory