rubyx/test
Torsten Ruger c0cd1e0740 fix an issue where instruction was in wrong code
embarrassingly used instance variable where it should have been local
2018-05-25 19:16:13 +03:00
..
arm more test fixing 2018-05-24 21:20:56 +03:00
bench fix mod4 name 2018-04-19 10:00:55 +03:00
elf change to position objects complete 2018-05-05 20:25:10 +03:00
lib use modified opal logger 2018-05-20 14:45:48 +03:00
mom busy fixing tests 2018-05-24 19:38:48 +03:00
parfait another +1 bug 2018-05-15 16:25:55 +03:00
risc fix an issue where instruction was in wrong code 2018-05-25 19:16:13 +03:00
support fix an issue where instruction was in wrong code 2018-05-25 19:16:13 +03:00
vool assemble risc to it's position (not itself) 2018-05-17 09:49:01 +03:00
helper.rb more remote debugging 2017-04-14 14:38:23 +03:00
README.md remove traces of salama 2017-08-29 18:38:51 +03:00
test_all.rb restrict tests to test dir 2017-04-14 20:37:47 +03:00

Testing

Testing is off course great, and well practised in the ruby community. Good tests exists in the parts where functionality is clear: Parsing and binary generation.

But it is difficult to write tests when you don't know what the functionality is. Also TDD does not really help as it assumes you know what you're doing.

I used minitest as the framework, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to rubyx, less work.

All

'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''

Parfait

Well, test Parfait. Not perfect, but growing as bugs appear. Basics are ok though.

Compiler

Different kinds of quite minimal tests that ensure we can go from parsed to code.

Fragments

Much more elaborate tests of the compling functionality. All code constructs and their output in terms of instructions are tested.

vm

Mostly tests about the Parfait compatibility layer and padding (for assmenbly). Slightly bad name ... wip