rubyx/test
Torsten Ruger 57f37ec023 removed blocks and moved to labels
somewhat easier to understand the code as a linked list
relatively painless change, considering
2015-10-23 21:27:36 +03:00
..
bench arm program to generate optimal devision code for constants 2014-05-15 16:53:47 +03:00
compiler removed blocks and moved to labels 2015-10-23 21:27:36 +03:00
elf removed blocks and moved to labels 2015-10-23 21:27:36 +03:00
interpreter removed blocks and moved to labels 2015-10-23 21:27:36 +03:00
parfait prune builtin 2015-10-23 15:13:05 +03:00
register fold last of the virtual into register 2015-10-22 18:16:29 +03:00
helper.rb fold last of the virtual into register 2015-10-22 18:16:29 +03:00
README.md went over the various readmes 2015-10-07 11:32:48 +03:00
test_all.rb fold last of the virtual into register 2015-10-22 18:16:29 +03:00
test_runner.rb update the reader rewrite and reflect name changes 2015-10-09 17:51:14 +03:00

Testing

Testing is off course great, and well practised in the ruby community. Good tests exists in the parts where functionality is clear: Parsing and binary generation.

But it is difficult to write tests when you don't know what the functionality is. Also TDD does not really help as it assumes you know what you're doing.

I used minitest / test-unit as the framewok, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to salama, less work.

All

'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''

Parfait

Well, test Parfait. Not perfect, but growing as bugs appear. Basics are ok though.

Compiler

Different kinds of quite minimal tests that ensure we can go from parsed to code.

Fragments

Much more elaborate tests of the compling functionality. All code constructs and their output in terms of instructions are tested.

vm

Mostly tests about the Parfait compatibility layer and padding (for assmenbly). Slightly bad name ... wip