33ffcf1d88
rather make resolve an instruction. Since it was coded in risc anyway, we not only save the setup and call But also makes the mom instruction flow clearer The method really came from not wanting to code it in risc, but with the Builder, that is now surprisingly painless |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| arm | ||
| bench | ||
| elf | ||
| fragments | ||
| lib | ||
| mom | ||
| parfait | ||
| risc | ||
| support | ||
| vool | ||
| helper.rb | ||
| README.md | ||
| test_all.rb | ||
Testing
Testing is off course great, and well practised in the ruby community. Good tests exists in the parts where functionality is clear: Parsing and binary generation.
But it is difficult to write tests when you don't know what the functionality is. Also TDD does not really help as it assumes you know what you're doing.
I used minitest as the framework, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to rubyx, less work.
All
'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''
Parfait
Well, test Parfait. Not perfect, but growing as bugs appear. Basics are ok though.
Compiler
Different kinds of quite minimal tests that ensure we can go from parsed to code.
Fragments
Much more elaborate tests of the compling functionality. All code constructs and their output in terms of instructions are tested.
vm
Mostly tests about the Parfait compatibility layer and padding (for assmenbly). Slightly bad name ... wip