rubyx/test
Torsten Ruger 0a54d030b5 add guard
2015-08-08 18:08:15 +03:00
..
bench arm program to generate optimal devision code for constants 2014-05-15 16:53:47 +03:00
compiler fix the plus method that sneaked into arm 2015-08-06 18:55:08 +03:00
fragments add guard 2015-08-08 18:08:15 +03:00
interpreter fix test result, but not test yet 2015-08-07 16:46:55 +03:00
parfait bit more testing 2015-08-06 18:26:59 +03:00
virtual add guard 2015-08-08 18:08:15 +03:00
helper.rb move from new_object to normal new 2015-07-20 13:01:15 +03:00
README.md move sof to own repo 2015-05-03 20:38:13 +03:00
test_all.rb add interpreter here (moved from debugger) 2015-07-30 19:18:12 +03:00
test_runner.rb work on ObjectWriter 2015-05-16 12:53:10 +03:00

Testing

Testing is off course great, and well practised in the ruby community. Good tests exists in the parts where functionality is clear: Parsing and binary generation.

But it is difficult to write tests when you don't know what the functionality is. Also TDD does not really help as it assumes you know what you're doing.

I used minitest / test-unit as the framewok, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to salama, less work.

All

'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''

vm

As this is all quite new, i tend to test only when i know that the functionality will stay that way. Otherwise it's just too much effort to rewrite and rewrite the tests.

There used to be better tests, but rewrites bring fluctuation, so poke around and make suggestion :-)