History

Torsten Ruger 03a4e04f7e rename self to receiver just because it is a keyword and can’t be used		2018-03-14 20:26:13 +05:30
..
arm	remove all test_all	2017-04-13 17:00:56 +03:00
bench	rename register to risc	2017-01-19 09:02:29 +02:00
elf	stash old vm	2018-03-11 17:02:42 +05:30
fragments	moving vool_method to parfait	2017-12-10 20:47:26 +02:00
lib	remove all test_all	2017-04-13 17:00:56 +03:00
mom	actually adding risc instructions	2018-03-14 17:41:09 +05:30
parfait	rename locals to frame	2018-03-14 20:24:47 +05:30
risc	stash old vm	2018-03-11 17:02:42 +05:30
support	better name for cool compile	2018-03-12 17:23:16 +05:30
vool	rename self to receiver	2018-03-14 20:26:13 +05:30
helper.rb	more remote debugging	2017-04-14 14:38:23 +03:00
README.md	remove traces of salama	2017-08-29 18:38:51 +03:00
test_all.rb	restrict tests to test dir	2017-04-14 20:37:47 +03:00

README.md

Testing

Testing is off course great, and well practised in the ruby community. Good tests exists in the parts where functionality is clear: Parsing and binary generation.

But it is difficult to write tests when you don't know what the functionality is. Also TDD does not really help as it assumes you know what you're doing.

I used minitest as the framework, just because it is lighter and thus when the time comes to move to rubyx, less work.

All

'''' ruby test/test_all.rb ''''

Parfait

Well, test Parfait. Not perfect, but growing as bugs appear. Basics are ok though.

Compiler

Different kinds of quite minimal tests that ensure we can go from parsed to code.

Fragments

Much more elaborate tests of the compling functionality. All code constructs and their output in terms of instructions are tested.

vm

Mostly tests about the Parfait compatibility layer and padding (for assmenbly). Slightly bad name ... wip