9 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Torsten	6273ab769c	redid the old benchmarks ... With #26 out of the way, was able to get meaningful rubyx benchmarks. Meaning loops large enough for the exec time to go significantly over the noop. Did mruby too and as expected got much lower noop	2019-07-30 13:55:29 +03:00
Torsten	95af84e752	fixing test to pass ... and extract own kind of same tests to bench bench tests will need some loop, but not as large as c	2019-07-25 21:25:15 +03:00
Torsten	00bf38a0e6	updating benchmarks ... on the new machine, consistent not rubyx yet	2019-07-23 20:14:28 +03:00
Torsten Ruger	f3248462cc	remove references to soml	2016-12-11 12:55:03 +02:00
Torsten Ruger	707c180cab	add go results, just cause I'm learning it	2015-11-27 19:54:43 +02:00
Torsten Ruger	fa63c6db6a	add ruby bench programs and numbers	2015-11-24 15:33:16 +02:00
Torsten Ruger	535757fa98	did the ratios ... i think percentages with +/- is best otherwise it becomes an issue of which way you look at it. 1,33 or inverse 0.75 looks like a third one way and a quarter the other	2015-11-21 17:04:20 +02:00
Torsten Ruger	0cbf346519	redid the test, snapped variance ... yesterday i had stray processes skewing the results also figured out c was buffering prints looking good	2015-11-21 16:35:30 +02:00
Torsten Ruger	96972dab29	thats most of the benchmarking ... strange about the puts in soml, hard to see where a factor of 10 would come from	2015-11-20 23:51:58 +02:00