ruby-x/rubyx
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rename Vool to Sol

Browse Source 
Simple is really the descriptive name for the layer
Sure, it is "virtual" but that is not as important as the fact that it is simple (or simplified)
Also objct (based really) is better, since orientated implies it is a little like that, but only orientated, not really it. Sol only has objects, nothing else
Just cause i was renaming anyway
This commit is contained in:
Torsten Rüger
2019-10-04 00:36:49 +03:00
parent aa9fc8bc81
commit d1f8733623
135 changed files with 636 additions and 636 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
lib/ruby/README.md
View File

@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ what we may loosely call type here, ie the kind of statement.
The ruby layer is really all about defining classes for every kind of statement,
thus "typing" the syntax tree, and making it concrete.
## to Vool
## to Sol
In our nice layers, we are on the way down to Vool, a simplified version of oo.
In our nice layers, we are on the way down to Sol, a simplified version of oo.
It has proven handy to have this layer, so the code for transforming each object
is in the class representing that object. (As one does in oo, again imho).
@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ will surely follow.
The compilation process ends up creating (parfait) objects to represent
things like classes, types and constants. This is not done here yet, but in
the vool layer.
the sol layer.