rename bosl to phisol

lib/phisol/compiler.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   class Compiler < AST::Processor
 
     def initialize()

lib/phisol/compiler/README.md

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ The compiler has a method for each type for ast, named along on_xxx with xxx as
 
 #### Compiler holds scope
 
-The Compiler instance can hold arbitrary scope needed during the compilation. Since we compile bosl
+The Compiler instance can hold arbitrary scope needed during the compilation. Since we compile Phisol
 (a static language) things have become more simple.
 
 A class statement sets the current @clazz scope , a method definition the @method.
@@ -69,10 +69,10 @@ The important thing here is that Messages and Frames are normal objects.
 
 ### Distinctly future proof
 
-Bosl is designed to be used as an implementation language for a higher oo language. Some, or
+Phisol is designed to be used as an implementation language for a higher oo language. Some, or
 even many, features may not make sense on their own. But these features, like several return
 addresses, are important to implement the higher language.
 
-In fact, Bosl's main purpose is not even to be written. The main purpose is to have a language to
+In fact, Phisol's main purpose is not even to be written. The main purpose is to have a language to
 compile ruby to. In the same way that the assembler layer in salama is not designed to be written,
 we just need it to create our layers.

lib/phisol/compiler/basic_expressions.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   # collection of the simple ones, int and strings and such
 
   Compiler.class_eval do

lib/phisol/compiler/callsite_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_call expression

lib/phisol/compiler/class_field.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_class_field expression

lib/phisol/compiler/compound_expressions.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
 #    attr_reader :values

lib/phisol/compiler/expression_list.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 #    list - attr_reader  :expressions
     def on_expressions expession

lib/phisol/compiler/field_access.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_field_access expression

lib/phisol/compiler/field_def.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_field_def expression

lib/phisol/compiler/function_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_function  expression

lib/phisol/compiler/if_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 #    if - attr_reader  :cond, :if_true, :if_false
 

lib/phisol/compiler/module_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 #    module attr_reader  :name ,:expressions
     def on_module expression

lib/phisol/compiler/name_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
       #    attr_reader  :name

lib/phisol/compiler/operator_expressions.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_operator expression

lib/phisol/compiler/return_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
 #    return attr_reader  :expression

lib/phisol/compiler/while_expression.rb

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-module Bosl
+module Phisol
   Compiler.class_eval do
 
     def on_while expression

lib/register/builtin/README.md

@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ Slightly more here : http://salama.github.io/2014/06/10/more-clarity.html (then
 
 The Builtin module is scattered into several files, but that is just so the file doesn't get too long.
 
-Note: This is about to change slightly with the arrival of Bosl.  Bosl is a lower level function,
+Note: This is about to change slightly with the arrival of Phisol.  Phisol is a lower level function,
 and as such there is not much that we need that can not be expressed in it. My current thinking
-is that i can code anything in bosl and will only need the bosl instruction set.
+is that i can code anything in Phisol and will only need the Phisol instruction set.
 So this whole Builtin approach may blow over in the next months. It had already become clear that
-mostly this was going to be about memory access, which in bosl is part of the language.
+mostly this was going to be about memory access, which in Phisol is part of the language.

lib/virtual.rb

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require "virtual/positioned"
 require "virtual/padding"
 require "virtual/parfait_adapter"
 
-require "bosl/compiler"
+require "Phisol/compiler"
 require "virtual/instruction"
 require "virtual/method_source"
 require "virtual/slots/slot"

lib/virtual/machine.rb

@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ module Virtual
       syntax  = @parser.parse_with_debug(bytes)
       parts = Parser::Transform.new.apply(syntax)
       #puts parts.inspect
-      Bosl::Compiler.compile( parts )
+      Phisol::Compiler.compile( parts )
     end
 
     private