updating benchmarks
on the new machine, consistent not rubyx yet
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,36 +1,28 @@
|
||||
# Benchmarks
|
||||
|
||||
loop - program does empty loop of same size as hello
|
||||
hello - output hello world (to dev/null) to measure kernel calls (not terminal speed)
|
||||
itos - convert integers from 1 to 100000 to string
|
||||
add - run integer adds by linear fibonacci of 40
|
||||
call - exercise calling by recursive fibonacci of 20
|
||||
hello - output hello world to measure kernel calls
|
||||
add - run integer adds by linear fibonacci of 20
|
||||
call - exercise calling by recursive fibonacci of 10
|
||||
noop - a baseline that does nothing
|
||||
|
||||
Hello and puti and add run 100_000 iterations per program invocation to remove startup overhead.
|
||||
Call only has 10000 iterations, as it much slower
|
||||
|
||||
Gcc used to compile c on the machine
|
||||
typed produced by ruby (on another machine)
|
||||
All programs (apart from noop) run 1M times to minimize startup impact.
|
||||
|
||||
C was linked statically as dynamic linked influences times. Output was sent to /dev/null, so as
|
||||
to measure the calling and not the terminal.
|
||||
# Results
|
||||
|
||||
Results were measured by a ruby script. Mean and variance was measured until variance was low,
|
||||
always under one percent.
|
||||
always under one percent. Noop showed that program startup is a factor, so all programs loop to 1M.
|
||||
|
||||
The machine was a virtual arm run on a powerbook, performance roughly equivalent to a raspberry pi.
|
||||
But results should be seen as relative, not absolute.
|
||||
The machine was a virtual arm (qemu) run on a acer swift 5 (i5 8265 3.9GHz), performance roughly equivalent to a raspberry pi.
|
||||
But results (in ms) should be seen as relative, not absolute.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
language | loop | hello | itos | add | call
|
||||
c | 0,0500 | 2,1365 | 0,2902 | 0,1245 | 0,8535
|
||||
go | 0.0485 | 4.5355 | 0.2143 | 0.0825 | 0.8769
|
||||
typed | 0,0374 | 1,2071 | 0,7263 | 0,2247 | 1,3625
|
||||
language | noop | hello | add | call
|
||||
c | 45 | 100 | 72 | 591
|
||||
go | 53 | 4060 | 64 | 624
|
||||
rubyx | 0,0374 | 1,2071 | 0,2247 | 1,3625
|
||||
|
||||
ruby | 0,3 | 8.882 | 0,8971 | 3,8452
|
||||
|
||||
2c | - 33 % | - 79 % | + 150% | + 80 % | + 60 %
|
||||
|
||||
2r | x 10 | x 6 | + 23% | x 17 | x 26
|
||||
ruby | 1830 | 2750 | 3000 | 1900_000
|
||||
|
||||
Comparison with ruby, not really for speed, just to see how much leeway there is for our next layer.
|
||||
Ruby startup time is 1,5695 seconds, which we'll subtract from the benches
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user