fixed typos, small corrections

_layouts/site.html

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
 			<div class="row center">
 				<div class="span12">
 					<div class="vspace10">
-						<p>&copy; Copyright 2013/14.</p>
+						<p>&copy; Copyright 2014.</p>
 					</div>
 				</div>
 			</div>

about.html

@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@ title: Crystal, where it started
     <h2 class="center">Smalltalk</h2>
     <p>
       Smalltalk is the mother of OO for me.  Adele Goldberg has written down the details of early implementations in the
-      Blue Book, which made a great impression on me. Having read it mri code is quite easy to understand. <br/>
+      Blue Book, which made a great impression on me. Having read it, mri code is quite easy to understand. <br/>
       Unfortunately Smalltalk was too far ahead of it's time and used the image, the implications of which are still
       not understood imho.<br/>
       Additional bad luck struck when, in Steven Jobs great heist of the PARC UI, he did not recognise the value of it's 
-      implementation language and so Smalltalk did not get the same boost as the gui.
+      implementation language and so pure OO did not get the same boost as the gui. Instead we got difficult c dialects.
     </p>
   </div>
 
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ title: Crystal, where it started
     </p>
     <p>
       Rails has sort of given Ruby it's purpose and made it grow from a perl like scripting language to a server programming
-      environment with all the whistle and bells. Rails maturity and code quality make it not only a joy to use,
+      environment with all the whistles and bells. Rails maturity and code quality make it not only a joy to use,
       but an excellent source for good ruby practises. 
     </p>
     <p>
@@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ title: Crystal, where it started
       </p>
       <p>
         <b><a href="http://metasm.cr0.org/">Metasm</a></b> finally confirmed what i had suspected for a while.
-        Namely that you don't need C to generate (machine) code. Metasm has be been assmbling, deassembling and 
+        Namely that you don't need C to generate machine code. Metasm has be been assmbling, deassembling and 
         compiling for several cpu's since 2007, in 100% ruby. 
-        A great feat, and the only reason i don't use it is because it is too big (for now).
+        A great feat, and the only reason i don't use it is because it is too big (for me to understand).
       </p>
       <p>
         <b><a href="https://github.com/cyndis/as">As</a></b> ended up being the starting point for the assembly layer.

crystal.html

@@ -39,8 +39,10 @@ title: Crystal, a simple and minimal oo machine
       If only. Ruby is full of niceties that actually make parsing it quite difficult. But at the moment that story hasn't
       even started.
       <br/>
-      Parslet lets us use modules for parts of the parser, so those files are pretty self explanitory. Not all is done, but 
+      Parslet lets us use modules for parts of the parser, so those files are pretty self-explanitory. Not all is done, but 
-      a good start. Parslet also has a seperate Transformation pass, and that creates the AST. Those class names are also
+      a good start. 
+      <br/>
+      Parslet also has a seperate Transformation pass, and that creates the AST. Those class names are also
       easy, so you can guess what an IfExpression represents.
       <br/>
     </p>
@@ -53,11 +55,12 @@ title: Crystal, a simple and minimal oo machine
     <p>
       The Virtual machine layer (vm) is where it gets interesting, but also more fuzzy.
       <br/>
-      Currently still quite simple, we have Classes for things we know, like program and function. Also hings we need 
+      Currently still quite simple, we have Classes for things we know, like program and function. Also things we need 
       to create the code, like Blocks and Instructions.
       <br/>
-      The most interesting thing is maybe the idea of a Value, which are a bit like Variables, just constant. And so to 
+      The most interesting thing is maybe the idea of a Value. If you think of Variables, Values are what a variable may 
-      change value of what we think of as a variable, we create a new Value (of possibly different basic type). Thus
+      be assigned, but it may carry a storage place (register). Values are constant, and so to 
+      change a value, we have to create a new Value (of possibly different basic type). Thus
       all machine instructions are the trasformation of values into new ones.
       <br/>
       Also interesting is the slightly unripe Basic Type system. We have a set of machine-word size types and do not 

css/stylesheet.css

@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@ body {
 	/*background: #FCFCFC url(../img/pattern.png) top left repeat;*/
 }
 
-a {
-	color: #666666;
-}
-
 a:hover {
 	color: #000000;
 }

index.html

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ title: Ruby in Ruby is 100% ruby
       everyone is fooled into believing only c is fast. Whereas what is true is that <em>static</em> code is fast.
     </p>
     <p>
-      On a very similar note there we are lead to believe that os features must be used from c. Whereas system calls
+      On a very similar note we are lead to believe that os features must be used from c. Whereas system calls
       are software interrupts and only the c std library makes them look like c functions. But they are not.
     </p>
     <p>

qemu.md

@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@ Even if you have a Pi, [this explains](/remote_pi.html) a nice way to develop wi
 
 Written April 2014: as of writing the latest and greatest llvm based gcc (5.1) on Maverick (10.9) has a bug that makes qemu hang.
 
-So type gcc -v and if the output contains "LLVM version 5.1", you must install gcc4.2. Easily donw with homebrew:
+So type gcc -v and if the output contains "LLVM version 5.1", you must install gcc4.2. Easily done with homebrew:
 
     brew install https://raw.github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-dupes/master/apple-gcc42.rb
 
-This will not interfere with the systems compiler as the gcc4.3 has postfixed executables (ie gcc-4.2) 
+This will not interfere with the systems compiler as the gcc4.2 has postfixed executables (ie gcc-4.2) 
 
 ###Qemu
 

what_is.html

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ title: Crystal and Ruby, Ruby and Crystal
 			<div class="span4">
 				<h4>Syntax</h4>
 				<h5>and meaning</h5>
-				<blockquote><p> Pure OO, blocks, closures, often no need for braces, simple but consistant, open classes<br/></p></blockquote>
+				<blockquote><p> Pure OO, blocks, closures,clean syntax, simple but consistant, open classes<br/></p></blockquote>
         <p> Just to name a few of the great features of the ruby syntax and it's programming model. <br/>
           Syntax is an abstract thing, as far as i know there is no ebnf or similar definition of it.
           Also as far as i know there is only the mri which is considered the only source of how ruby works. <br/>
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ title: Crystal and Ruby, Ruby and Crystal
 				<blockquote><p> The heart of the ruby-in-ruby project is crystal, the virtual machine <br /></p></blockquote>
         <p>Crystal is written in 100% ruby</p>
         <p>Crystal uses an existing ruby to bootstrap itself</p>
-        <p>Crystal generates native code, and ( with 1+2) creates a native ruby (virtual) machine that is able to
+        <p>Crystal generates native code, and ( with 1+2) creates a native ruby virtual machine. </p> 
-        generate code on the fly and thus alter itself.</p>
         <p>Crystal does not interpret, it parses and compiles (just making sure that's clear)</p>
         <p>Crystal uses a statically typed value based core with rtti and oo syntax to achieve this 
             (think c++ with ruby syntax)</p>