Files

T

dev 307d2fd471 feat: add project-review workflow (whole-project / single-feature review)

Adds the project-review workflow for code review independent of the git
diff. The scope is parsed from the user instruction: 全面/整个项目 ->
whole-project (score every source file), otherwise feature + target
keyword (locate the code with semantic search + graph queries).

- scoring_tools.py: score_review_func gains all_files=True to score every
  source file in the graph via store.get_all_files()
- main.py: score_review_tool gains all_files param; registers the
  project_review MCP prompt (prompts 6->7)
- prompts.py: project_review_prompt(scope, target) with whole-project and
  feature branches (fixed a precedence bug that truncated the feature text)
- skills.py + skills/project-review/: new read-only project-review skill
  with shared checklists
- .opencode/command/code-review-graph-project-review.md: slash command
- tests: test_project_review.py (prompt rendering), TestProjectReviewPrompt,
  skill count assertions 5->6, all_files wiring checks
- docs: prompts (6->7) + project-review entries across COMMANDS, CLAUDE,
  README (+localized), INDEX, architecture, LLM-OPTIMIZED-REFERENCE,
  CHANGELOG

2026-08-06 13:56:54 +08:00

609 B

Raw Blame History

Distributed Lock — Manual Review Checklist

High-risk module: distributed-lock changes require architecture confirmation.

Lock has a TTL / expiry — no permanent deadlock after crash
Lock release is atomic and ownership-checked (compare-and-delete)
Lock scope is correct (key includes the right entity identifiers)
Renewal / watchdog exists for long critical sections
Locking order is consistent across paths (no lock-ordering deadlock)
Fencing tokens / version check prevents stale-holder writes
Fail-open vs fail-closed behavior is intentional and documented

609 B Raw Blame History

Distributed Lock — Manual Review Checklist

609 B

Raw Blame History