feat: add unified_review MCP prompt + sync tool/prompt counts

Adds the unified_review MCP prompt (invoked as /code-review-graph:unified_review)
that drives the unified-review workflow: graph context -> detect_changes ->
score_review -> findings -> dedupe_findings -> generate_report. READ-ONLY:
every finding waits for a manual fix decision. Takes base and tier
(fast/standard/strict) arguments.

- prompts.py: unified_review_prompt + docstring count 5->6
- main.py: @mcp.prompt() registration
- tests/test_prompts.py: TestUnifiedReviewPrompt + preamble test
- docs: LLM-OPTIMIZED-REFERENCE, COMMANDS, CLAUDE.md, INDEX, architecture,
  README + 4 localized READMEs; tool count 30->31 and prompt count 5->6
  synced (historical ROADMAP/FEATURES version notes left unchanged)

CLAUDE.md

@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ When using code-review-graph MCP tools, follow these rules:
   - `parser.py` — Tree-sitter multi-language AST parser plus targeted fallbacks for broad source-language and notebook support
   - `custom_languages.py` — Config-driven custom language support (`.code-review-graph/languages.toml`, see docs/CUSTOM_LANGUAGES.md)
   - `graph.py` — SQLite-backed graph store (nodes, edges, weighted-score impact analysis)
-  - `tools/` — 30 MCP tool implementations split by domain
+  - `tools/` — 31 MCP tool implementations split by domain
-  - `main.py` — FastMCP server entry point, registers 30 tools + 5 prompts
+  - `main.py` — FastMCP server entry point, registers 31 tools + 6 prompts
   - `incremental.py` — Git-based change detection, file watching
   - `embeddings.py` — Optional vector embeddings (local sentence-transformers, OpenAI-compatible endpoints, Google Gemini, MiniMax)
   - `visualization.py` — D3.js interactive HTML graph generator
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ When using code-review-graph MCP tools, follow these rules:
   - `changes.py` — Risk-scored change impact analysis (detect-changes)
   - `refactor.py` — Rename preview, dead code detection, refactoring suggestions
   - `hints.py` — Review hint generation
-  - `prompts.py` — 5 MCP prompt templates (review_changes, architecture_map, debug_issue, onboard_developer, pre_merge_check)
+  - `prompts.py` — 6 MCP prompt templates (review_changes, architecture_map, debug_issue, onboard_developer, pre_merge_check, unified_review)
   - `wiki.py` — Markdown wiki generation from community structure
   - `skills.py` — Multi-platform install/config generation and shipped skill metadata
   - `registry.py` — Multi-repo registry helpers

README.hi-IN.md

@@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ code-review-graph serve            # MCP सर्वर शुरू करे
 | `list_repos_tool` | रजिस्टर्ड रिपॉज़िटरीज़ की सूची |
 | `cross_repo_search_tool` | सभी रजिस्टर्ड रिपॉज़िटरीज़ में सर्च करें |
 
-**MCP प्रॉम्प्ट्स** (5 वर्कफ़्लो टेम्प्लेट):
+**MCP प्रॉम्प्ट्स** (6 वर्कफ़्लो टेम्प्लेट):
-`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`
+`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`, `unified_review`
 
 </details>
 

README.ja-JP.md

@@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ code-review-graph serve            # MCPサーバーの起動
 | `list_repos_tool` | 登録済みリポジトリの一覧 |
 | `cross_repo_search_tool` | 全登録リポジトリを横断検索 |
 
-**MCPプロンプト**（5つのワークフローテンプレート）：
+**MCPプロンプト**（6つのワークフローテンプレート）：
-`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`
+`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`, `unified_review`
 
 </details>
 

README.ko-KR.md

@@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ code-review-graph serve            # MCP 서버 시작
 | `list_repos_tool` | 등록된 저장소 목록 |
 | `cross_repo_search_tool` | 등록된 모든 저장소에서 검색 |
 
-**MCP 프롬프트** (5개 워크플로 템플릿):
+**MCP 프롬프트** (6개 워크플로 템플릿):
-`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`
+`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`, `unified_review`
 
 </details>
 

README.md

@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ The benchmark also runs an honest **co-change mode**: the predictor is seeded wi
 | **Wiki generation** | Auto-generate markdown wiki from community structure |
 | **Multi-repo registry** | Register multiple repos, search across all of them |
 | **Multi-repo daemon** | `crg-daemon` watches multiple repos as child processes, with health checks and auto-restart |
-| **MCP prompts** | 5 workflow templates: review, architecture, debug, onboard, pre-merge |
+| **MCP prompts** | 6 workflow templates: review, architecture, debug, onboard, pre-merge, unified-review |
 | **Full-text search** | FTS5-powered hybrid search combining keyword and vector similarity |
 | **Local storage** | SQLite file in `.code-review-graph/`. Core graph storage needs no external database or cloud service. |
 | **Watch mode** | Continuous graph updates as you work |
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ full config reference and all available options.
 </details>
 
 <details>
-<summary><strong>30 MCP tools</strong></summary>
+<summary><strong>31 MCP tools</strong></summary>
 <br>
 
 Your AI assistant uses these automatically once the graph is built.
@@ -499,9 +499,12 @@ Your AI assistant uses these automatically once the graph is built.
 | `get_wiki_page_tool` | Retrieve a specific wiki page |
 | `list_repos_tool` | List registered repositories |
 | `cross_repo_search_tool` | Search across all registered repositories |
+| `score_review_tool` | Objective Layer-2 review metrics (good/warn/fail grades) |
+| `dedupe_findings_tool` | Fingerprint dedup + multi-source confidence merge |
+| `generate_report_tool` | Render the standalone HTML code review report |
 
-**MCP Prompts** (5 workflow templates):
+**MCP Prompts** (6 workflow templates):
-`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`
+`review_changes`, `architecture_map`, `debug_issue`, `onboard_developer`, `pre_merge_check`, `unified_review`
 
 </details>
 
@@ -611,7 +614,7 @@ code-review-graph embed --provider voyage --model voyage-code-3
 
 #### Tool Filtering
 
-CRG exposes 30 MCP tools by default. In token-constrained environments, you can
+CRG exposes 31 MCP tools by default. In token-constrained environments, you can
 limit the server to a subset of tools using `--tools` or the `CRG_TOOLS`
 environment variable:
 

README.zh-CN.md

@@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ code-review-graph serve            # 启动 MCP 服务器
 | `list_repos_tool` | 列出已注册的仓库 |
 | `cross_repo_search_tool` | 跨所有注册仓库搜索 |
 
-**MCP 提示模板**（5 种工作流模板）：
+**MCP 提示模板**（6 种工作流模板）：
-`review_changes`、`architecture_map`、`debug_issue`、`onboard_developer`、`pre_merge_check`
+`review_changes`、`architecture_map`、`debug_issue`、`onboard_developer`、`pre_merge_check`、`unified_review`
 
 </details>
 

code_review_graph/docs/LLM-OPTIMIZED-REFERENCE.md

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ score_review_tool returns objective metrics (sql_risk, exception_coverage, redun
 <section name="commands">
 Core MCP tools: get_minimal_context_tool, detect_changes_tool, get_review_context_tool, get_impact_radius_tool, query_graph_tool, semantic_search_nodes_tool, get_architecture_overview_tool, get_affected_flows_tool, list_flows_tool, list_communities_tool, refactor_tool, build_or_update_graph_tool, run_postprocess_tool, embed_graph_tool, list_graph_stats_tool, get_docs_section_tool
 Unified-review MCP tools: score_review_tool, dedupe_findings_tool, generate_report_tool
-MCP prompts (5): review_changes, architecture_map, debug_issue, onboard_developer, pre_merge_check
+MCP prompts (6): review_changes, architecture_map, debug_issue, onboard_developer, pre_merge_check, unified_review
 Skills: build-graph, debug-issue, explore-codebase, refactor-safely, review-changes, review-delta, review-pr, unified-review
 CLI: code-review-graph [install|init|build|update|status|watch|visualize|serve|mcp|wiki|detect-changes|postprocess|embed|register|unregister|repos|eval|daemon]
 Token efficiency: Prefer detail_level="minimal" where available. Always call get_minimal_context_tool first. Some review/context tools return compact estimated context_savings metadata.

code_review_graph/main.py

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ from .prompts import (
     onboard_developer_prompt,
     pre_merge_check_prompt,
     review_changes_prompt,
+    unified_review_prompt,
 )
 from .tools import (
     apply_refactor_func,
@@ -1124,6 +1125,21 @@ def pre_merge_check(base: str = "HEAD~1") -> list[dict]:
     return pre_merge_check_prompt(base=base)
 
 
+@mcp.prompt()
+def unified_review(base: str = "HEAD~1", tier: str = "standard") -> list[dict]:
+    """Three-layer unified review (CRG graph context + scoring + dedupe + report).
+
+    Fuses graph context with the objective scoring metrics, finding merge,
+    and the standalone HTML report.  READ-ONLY: every finding waits for a
+    manual fix decision.
+
+    Args:
+        base: Git ref to diff against. Default: HEAD~1.
+        tier: Review tier (fast / standard / strict). Default: standard.
+    """
+    return unified_review_prompt(base=base, tier=tier)
+
+
 def _apply_tool_filter(tools: str | None = None) -> None:
     """Remove tools not listed in the allow-list.
 

code_review_graph/prompts.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 """MCP prompt templates for Code Review Graph.
 
-Provides 5 pre-built prompt workflows, all enforcing token-efficient
+Provides 6 pre-built prompt workflows, all enforcing token-efficient
 detail_level="minimal" first patterns with get_minimal_context entry point.
 
 1. review_changes   - pre-commit review using detect_changes + affected_flows
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ detail_level="minimal" first patterns with get_minimal_context entry point.
 3. debug_issue      - guided debugging using search, flow tracing
 4. onboard_developer - new dev orientation using stats, architecture, flows
 5. pre_merge_check  - PR readiness with risk scoring, test gaps, dead code
+6. unified_review   - three-layer review: graph context + scoring + dedupe + report
 """
 
 from __future__ import annotations
@@ -157,3 +158,60 @@ def pre_merge_check_prompt(base: str = "HEAD~1") -> list[Message]:
         "7. Output: GO/NO-GO recommendation with 1-sentence "
         "justification + list of required follow-ups."
     )
+
+
+def unified_review_prompt(
+    base: str = "HEAD~1",
+    tier: str = "standard",
+) -> list[Message]:
+    """Three-layer unified review workflow (READ-ONLY).
+
+    Fuses CRG graph context with the objective scoring metrics
+    (score_review), finding merge (dedupe_findings), and the standalone
+    HTML report (generate_report).  Every finding is presented for a manual
+    fix decision -- this workflow never modifies code.
+
+    Args:
+        base: Git ref to diff against. Default: HEAD~1.
+        tier: Review tier.  "fast" (Layer 1 + blockers only),
+            "standard" (all layers), "strict" (full + per-item
+            confirmation).  Default: standard.
+    """
+    tier_notes = {
+        "fast": (
+            "fast tier: run Layers 1 and the blocker check only; "
+            "skip Layer 2 metrics and the report."
+        ),
+        "strict": (
+            "strict tier: full review; every blocker and major finding "
+            "needs per-item user confirmation before it is recorded."
+        ),
+    }.get(tier, "standard tier: run all layers.")
+    return _user(
+        f"{_TOKEN_EFFICIENCY_PREAMBLE}\n"
+        f"## Unified Review Workflow (base={base}, tier={tier})\n"
+        f"{tier_notes}\n"
+        "**READ-ONLY.** Present every finding for a manual fix decision. "
+        "Never modify code, commit, or push.\n"
+        '1. Call `get_minimal_context(task="unified review")` for the '
+        "risk overview.\n"
+        '2. Call `build_or_update_graph()` to ensure the graph is '
+        "current.\n"
+        '3. Call `detect_changes(detail_level="minimal")` for changed '
+        "files, risk score, test gaps and affected flows.\n"
+        '4. Call `score_review(detail_level="standard")` for the '
+        "objective metrics (sql_risk, exception_coverage, redundancy, "
+        "high-risk density, vulnerability).  Trust the tool grades; "
+        "LLM-judged metrics are in `llm_judged`.\n"
+        "5. Review the changed source (Layer 1 chain decomposition) and "
+        "produce findings with severity (blocker/major/minor), "
+        "confidence (1-10), file:line and a proposed fix.\n"
+        '6. Call `dedupe_findings(findings=<your findings>)` to merge '
+        "by fingerprint, boost multi-source confidence and compute the "
+        "PR quality score.\n"
+        '7. Call `generate_report(review_data=<verdict, tier, scope, '
+        'metrics, merged findings>)` to write code-review-report.html.\n'
+        "8. Output: verdict (✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL), severity counts, each "
+        "issue with confidence + fix, and the manual-review items.  "
+        "Any blocker → verdict ❌ FAIL."
+    )

docs/COMMANDS.md

@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ kind: str | None
 limit: int = 20
 ```
 
-## MCP Prompts (5 workflow templates)
+## MCP Prompts (6 workflow templates)
 
 ### `review_changes`
 Pre-commit review workflow using detect_changes, affected_flows, and test gaps.
@@ -336,6 +336,16 @@ PR readiness check with risk scoring, test gaps, and dead code detection.
 base: str = "HEAD~1"
 ```
 
+### `unified_review`
+Three-layer unified review: CRG graph context + objective scoring
+(`score_review`), finding merge (`dedupe_findings`), and the standalone
+HTML report (`generate_report`). READ-ONLY: every finding waits for a
+manual fix decision.
+```
+base: str = "HEAD~1"
+tier: str = "standard"   # fast | standard | strict
+```
+
 ## CLI Commands
 
 ```bash

docs/INDEX.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 - [USAGE.md](USAGE.md) -- How to install and use
 - [FAQ.md](FAQ.md) -- How it compares to LSP, RAG, grep, and similar tools; when not to use it
 - [FEATURES.md](FEATURES.md) -- What's included, changelog
-- [COMMANDS.md](COMMANDS.md) -- All 30 MCP tools, 5 MCP prompts, skills, and CLI commands
+- [COMMANDS.md](COMMANDS.md) -- All 31 MCP tools, 6 MCP prompts, skills, and CLI commands
 - [GITHUB_ACTION.md](GITHUB_ACTION.md) -- Risk-scored PR review comments via GitHub Actions
 - [CUSTOM_LANGUAGES.md](CUSTOM_LANGUAGES.md) -- Bring your own language via `.code-review-graph/languages.toml`
 - [LLM-OPTIMIZED-REFERENCE.md](../code_review_graph/docs/LLM-OPTIMIZED-REFERENCE.md) -- Token-optimized reference for MCP-capable AI coding agents

docs/architecture.md

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 │  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐              │
 │  │      MCP Server (stdio or localhost HTTP)  │              │
 │  │                                            │              │
-│  │  30 MCP Tools + 5 MCP Prompts              │              │
+│  │  31 MCP Tools + 6 MCP Prompts              │              │
 │  │  ├── Core: build, impact, query, review,   │              │
 │  │  │   search, traverse, embed, stats, docs  │              │
 │  │  ├── Flows: list, get, affected            │              │

tests/test_prompts.py

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ from code_review_graph.prompts import (
     onboard_developer_prompt,
     pre_merge_check_prompt,
     review_changes_prompt,
+    unified_review_prompt,
 )
 
 
@@ -167,6 +168,52 @@ class TestPreMergeCheckPrompt:
         assert "dead_code" in _text(result[0])
 
 
+class TestUnifiedReviewPrompt:
+    def test_returns_list_with_messages(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert isinstance(result, list)
+        assert len(result) >= 1
+
+    def test_message_has_role_and_content(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        for msg in result:
+            assert isinstance(msg, Message)
+            assert msg.role == "user"
+            assert _text(msg)
+
+    def test_default_base_and_tier(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        text = _text(result[0])
+        assert "HEAD~1" in text
+        assert "standard tier" in text
+
+    def test_custom_base_and_tier(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt(base="develop", tier="strict")
+        text = _text(result[0])
+        assert "base=develop" in text
+        assert "strict tier" in text
+
+    def test_mentions_score_review(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert "score_review" in _text(result[0])
+
+    def test_mentions_dedupe_findings(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert "dedupe_findings" in _text(result[0])
+
+    def test_mentions_generate_report(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert "generate_report" in _text(result[0])
+
+    def test_mentions_read_only(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert "READ-ONLY" in _text(result[0])
+
+    def test_mentions_blocker_rule(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert "FAIL" in _text(result[0])
+
+
 class TestTokenEfficiencyPreamble:
     """All prompts should include the token efficiency preamble."""
 
@@ -190,3 +237,7 @@ class TestTokenEfficiencyPreamble:
     def test_pre_merge_has_preamble(self):
         result = pre_merge_check_prompt()
         assert "get_minimal_context" in _text(result[0])
+
+    def test_unified_review_has_preamble(self):
+        result = unified_review_prompt()
+        assert "get_minimal_context" in _text(result[0])