feat: add project-review workflow (whole-project / single-feature review)

Adds the project-review workflow for code review independent of the git
diff. The scope is parsed from the user instruction: 全面/整个项目 ->
whole-project (score every source file), otherwise feature + target
keyword (locate the code with semantic search + graph queries).

- scoring_tools.py: score_review_func gains all_files=True to score every
  source file in the graph via store.get_all_files()
- main.py: score_review_tool gains all_files param; registers the
  project_review MCP prompt (prompts 6->7)
- prompts.py: project_review_prompt(scope, target) with whole-project and
  feature branches (fixed a precedence bug that truncated the feature text)
- skills.py + skills/project-review/: new read-only project-review skill
  with shared checklists
- .opencode/command/code-review-graph-project-review.md: slash command
- tests: test_project_review.py (prompt rendering), TestProjectReviewPrompt,
  skill count assertions 5->6, all_files wiring checks
- docs: prompts (6->7) + project-review entries across COMMANDS, CLAUDE,
  README (+localized), INDEX, architecture, LLM-OPTIMIZED-REFERENCE,
  CHANGELOG

.opencode/command/code-review-graph-unified-review.md

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $ARGUMENTS
 
 7. **Merge findings** by calling `dedupe_findings_tool(findings=<your findings>)` — fingerprint dedup, multi-source confidence boost, PR quality score.
 
-8. **Generate the report** by calling `generate_report_tool(review_data=<verdict, tier, scope, metrics, merged findings>)` — writes `code-review-report.html`.
+8. **Generate the report** by calling `generate_report_tool(review_data=<verdict, tier, scope, metrics, merged findings>)` — writes `code-review-report.html` and `code-review-report.md` (default `format="both"`).
 
 9. **Report** the verdict (✅ PASS / ❌ FAIL), severity counts, each issue with confidence + fix, and manual-review items.